Why I did not explain the planets’ conjunctions in my “Transit and Solar Returns”

I did not explain the planets’ conjunctions in my book “Transit and Solar Returns” not to save my energies (every paragraph in this book is quite detailed and I have never thought about sparing with hundreds of pages. Actually the book is about 600 pages and I was able to write even a 800 pages book…), but because I don’t consider it possible.

Well, let’s see why.

Personally, in my experience, I studied and I still do, that there is a very great difference between the transits of Pluto, Neptune and Uranus with all the celestials, and all the other transits.

In fact, according to my experience, I noted, thousands and thousands times, that, for example, it is not possible to consider a Pluto-Moon conjunction as a simple square or a simple trine. I think, instead, that observing the Uranus and Neptune and Pluto transits we have to think about a polarity between Pluto and Moon or Pluto and Mars or Pluto and Jupiter, etc., and we will note that in this kind of conjunctions the meanings of the squares, of the trines, of the oppositions, of the sextiles, of the semi-squares or of the sesquisquares converge in a multiple and varied action.

You are maybe asking yourselves: if it is possible to read a Uranus-Sun conjunction transit as a trine or a square, does it mean that anything is possible and that we can say everything and its contrary?

No it doesn’t, I practice the "Judgmental Astrology" which is to say an Astrology that places judgments and I never sail in muddy waters because, instead, I love to work without a safety net.

In my experience we cannot foresee if a Neptune-Mercury conjunction transit will express itself as a trine or in a way similar to a square if we don’t also take into account the Solar Return Chart.

In other words, whether the contemporarily Solar Return Chart is good or bad, my conjunction will act like a trine or a square.

All that I have written so far is valid, even if at a lower degree, for all the conjunctions and not only for the Pluto-Neptune-Uranus conjunctions.

Ciro Discepolo

(editing by dr. Manuela Coppola) 

Io sono sempre in altissimo mare per le riparazioni di Fastweb che non arrivano, ma se una parte di me impreca e vorrebbe procedere con gli avvocati, un'altra parte, quella che prevale, se la ride: questi signori non sanno che stanno obbedendo a dei "Simboli Planetari" e che mi stanno facendo scaricare posizioni che potrei pagare a prezzi assai più alti.
Del resto mi sembra vi stiate divertendo molto di più così e c'è anche una vostra maggiore e corale partecipazione con tanti consigli chiesti e ricevuti.

Per Eros, che ha già ricevuto buoni consigli, ci sarebbe anche Kittila, in Finlandia, con una decima splendida, ma una quinta (l'amore) bruttina... e lui si è già lamentato di avere avuto solo storie di letto quest'anno (di solito si lamentano tutti del contrario).


Come sempre, se dimentico qualcosa di urgente o di importante, ricordatemelo.

Buon weekend a Tutti.
Ciro Discepolo

www.cirodiscepolo.it 

www.solarreturns.com 

www.lunarreturns.com 

http://www.amazon.com/Ciro-Discepolo/e/B003DC8JOQ/ref=sr_tc_img_2_0?qid=1279032249&sr=1-2-ent